Michigan 9, Bellarmine 13

In the long-lost preview for this game, I thought Michigan would have a good chance to squeak out their second win on the year. That didn’t so much happen, and let’s explore why.

Tempo Free

From the official box score, a look at the tempo-free stats:

Bellarmine 2012
Bellarmine Michigan
Faceoff Wins 16 Faceoff Wins 10
Clearing 14-20 Clearing 15-21
Possessions 42 Possessions 37
Goals 13 Goals 9
Offensive Efficiency .310 Offensive Efficiency .243

Michigan – Brian Greiner, specifically – had a rough day on faceoffs against a team that really hadn’t been particularly good coming in. Without seeing the game live (no option to buy just the one-game video stream on the Michigan website), it’s tough to say what led to the struggles, but 9/25 (J.D. Johnson took and won one faceoff) is pretty bad.

Neither team cleared the ball well at all, and again that can be explained by a multitude of factors – including that both squads have limited experience playing in huge stadiums.

From an efficiency standpoint, Michigan was quite poor and Bellarmine was just OK. Turnovers were a bugaboo for the Wolverines – though they managed to force enough out of Bellarmine to even up possessions.

Notes

I already mentioned a bit about faceoffs. Simply put, it was a poor performance. Unlike against Loyola, where the strategy involved a limited effort to win draws, instead relying on sound defense after losing them, this just wasn’t a good day in the middle. Greiner still managed to tie for the team lead in ground balls, with five.

As we’ve seen in most games for the Wolverines this year, they struck first. As we’ve seen all but once, they allowed the opponent to mount a comeback and take the win. I wouldn’t describe the trend as “troubling” – that would imply that there’s something mysterious or disappointing about it. On the contrary, this team simply doesn’t have the talent and depth to sit on a lead unless they play perfectly, and that’s something very hard to pull off. Some problems with this team won’t be fixed until a year or two down the road.

Taking those first two points in combination, Michigan didn’t lose this game at the faceoff X, but it likely played a role in the outcome. They were rolling early with faceoffs wins, but once Bellarmine started clawing back into it, they captured momentum with a dominant run on draws over the final three quarters, helping earn and ultimately seal the win.

Trevor Yealy led Michigan in scoring with two goals and an assist, and Will Meter wasn’t far behind him with two goals of his own. Alex Vasileff had a goal and an assist to close out multi-point scorers. LSM J.D. Johnson had an assist in the game.

I mentioned that turnovers were a problem for Michigan (though probably not a huge one, for once), and a pair of Wolverines – midfielder Willie Steenland and close defenseman Rob Healy – each committed three, the only players on Michigan’s team with more than one.

J.D. Johnson led Michigan with five caused turnovers – and didn’t commit any of his own. Along with the aforementioned assist and three ground balls, he had an excellent day.

Emil Weiss started and played three quarters in net. He allowed nine goals and made nine saves. Dylan Westerhold allowed four goals in the fourth quarter and didn’t make any saves. John Paul mentioned “we lost Emil” in the official site recap, so obviously he went out with injury. It’s unclear when he’ll return.

For the opposition, Troy Athens alum Andrew Bulgarelli won 15 of 23 faceoffs and scored a goal. The offensive headliner was attackman Austin Bright, who scored two goals and dished out three assists.

Elsewhere

Official site recap from Michigan, official site recap from Bellarmine, boxscore, photo gallery.

Up Next

Mount St. Mary’s visits the Big House Saturday at 3 p.m. The Mountaineers are 2-4 early in the season with the lone victories coming over Delaware and VMI.

The game will allegedly have coverage on GameTracker and streaming video, but since neither was both available for a reasonable fee and fully functional last weekend, stay tuned. I should be in attendance this time around, so you can follow on Twitter @GreatLaxState for blow-by-blow updates.

This entry was posted in division 1 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Michigan 9, Bellarmine 13

  1. AndyD says:

    The clearing issues were mostly due to the fact that both teams run a 10 man ride almost every time. I thought Michigan’s clearing problems were more about execution though. They had guys open or threw a couple bad passes. Bellarmine really struggled with UM’s ride. Their turnovers were more of the forced variety, and they got banged with one 30 second count. Even the long goal their goalie scored came at the end of the count. He heaved it because he was running out time, and it went in. Nice play by him.

    Michigan’s faceoff struggles continue to hurt them more than anything else. Bellarmine scored immediately after the goalie goal on a fast break off the faceoff, which had to be a back-breaker. Reminded me of the old days when Michigan would do that to everyone. I hope Lott is as good as advertised.

    Goalie play is actually pretty good when Weiss is in, from what I saw. When he went out after the third it was a 2-goal game despite the full-field goal and faceoff struggles. They were in it. First two shots of the fourth go in against Westerhold, and neither were great shots. Game over.

    • Tim says:

      Weiss is a definite upgrade over Westerhold, in just about every respect. I’m actually surprised the Wolverines cleared well (2/3) in the fourth, because that was a huge problem for Westerhold earlier in the year.

      As far as the ride – I’m surprised Michigan went to 10-man that much. It had been mostly a changeup in previous games. The coaching staff must have seen something in Bellarmine’s film that they thought they could exploit (and then they did exploit it).

      As problems clearing go… some of the things wrong with this team won’t be fixed until there’s a bit of a talent upgrade in coming recruiting classes (same with faceoffs, to a degree – although those hadn’t been a serious problem since the first game against Detroit).

  2. Reg Hartner says:

    Next game is huge. The Mount has has some Jekell/Hyde moments this season beating Delaware but losing to Towson. If Michigan can catch them on a day like they played Towson they could pull off win #2 and do it at The Big House. That’s a statement.

    If they can’ pull off the upset it’s going to be a long rest of the year.

    • Tim says:

      Delaware has been a similarly streaky team this year, and it seems like you never know which one you’re going to get. I actually think beating them is impressive, but not that impressive. Towson and MSM are ranked around the same area by Laxpower, but I actually think Towson is a pretty good team (only losses to Hopkins, Loyola, and a middling Navy team) and once they play more games, their rating will go up.

      It should be a pretty tall task for the Wolverines on Saturday – they really let an opportunity slip through their grasp against Bellarmine.

      • AndyD says:

        Unfortunately, any opportunity they had was ripped from their fingers when Weiss went down.

        I think Rutgers is a winnable game. Ohio State? Maybe. If the stars align.

  3. Pingback: Lax Links: March 22, 2012 | Great Lax State

Comments are closed.